The Golden Triangle Construction Users
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760316439
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2011
- Location
- Nederland, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4092019196
- Rating
- 38
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Engineering
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $133,084
- Expenses
- $107,560
- Assets
- $223,643
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote efficiency in public and private construction in said geographic areas of interest through the collection, analysis and reporting of industry activities and problems.
What it reported doing in 2011
1. To promote efficiency in public and private construction in said geographic areas of interest through the collection, analysis and reporting of industry activities and problems;2. To gather and disseminate information to its membership and where appropriate, to the public on matters affecting the construction industry in said geographic area of interest such as proposed legislation, trends in collective bargaining, wage and benefit scales, work practices, manpower forcasts, jurisdictional disputes, escalation of costs and the like;3. To assist contractors and their associations involved in an actual or potential conflict with the construction workers by providing information on the prevailing wages and working conditions in the construction industry and by advising them on what constitutes, in THE COUNCIL'S opinion, fair and acceptable wages and working conditions.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.5%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 7.5% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $45K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.