The Gohan Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 743165462
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2123853550
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $226,846
- Expenses
- $78,529
- Assets
- $498,686
- Liabilities
- $6,022
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN ROBBINS (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SAORI KAWANO (FOUNDER & CHAIR)
- NILS NOREN (TREASURER)
- MICHAEL ROMANO (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the gohan society is to foster a mutual appreciation of culinary heritage between the united states and japan through outreach to chefs, culinary arts students and professionals and food enthusiasts.
What it reported doing in 2024
We are committed to the principles of cultural and gastronomic education and exchange. In support of our mission, we worked on the following four programs:1. Chef scholarship program in japan-this program sends chefs from the united states to japan on a 17-day culinary cultural immersion program which includes, staging in top japanese restaurants, learning about new cooking techniques and ingredients and providing cultural experiences in the arts, food and lifestyle of japan. Through exposure to these new ideas, chefs integrate knowledge learned into their culinary repertoires enhancing their abilities and providing them with increased success in their careers and furthering their appreciation of japanese culture.2. Chef scholarship program in the u.s.- this program is the opposite of the chef culinary program in japan as it brings chefs from japan to the u.s to expand their horizons by being immersed in a program of staging in top restaurants in the u.s. And experiencing cultural awareness of american products, ultimately furthering the chefs' appreciation of american cuisine and promoting a firm appreciation of culture in the U.S.3. Student programming in the public schools- the gohan society provides educational programming in the public high schools on japanese cooking techniques and ingredients and provides nutritional education to students to help them in career education and to understand healthy options in eating and cooking for them and their families.4. Bringing high school culinary students to the u.s. -the gohan society provides cultural and staging experiences in restaurants in the u.s. To top culinary high school students from japan, ultimately furthering their appreciation of learning american cooking techniques and promoting an appreciation of u.s. Culture.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 65.4%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.35; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.