The Global Preservation Soci Inc
Legal name: The Global Preservation Society Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832631077
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Weston, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2035573640
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $2,629
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELVIN GREEN (PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY D GREEN (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
People named in this filing
- TIFFANY D GREEN (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)
- KELVIN GREEN (PRESIDENT)
- TIFFANY D GREEN (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The global preservation society (gps) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to connecting young people all over the world on the topic of sustainability.
What it reported doing in 2025
The global preservation society (gps) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting global citizenship by creating an open dialogue between young leaders from different countries reflecting diverse perspectives and priorities towards the goals of environmental stewardship and worldwide sustainability. Objectives include raising funds for grassroots initiatives at the local level, educating the community about sustainable living practices, and researching innovative opportunities to promote sustainability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -55.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -61.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -20.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.