The Glenn English National Cooperative Leadership Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461424031
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Arlington, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7039075914
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,118
- Expenses
- $15,022
- Assets
- $400,920
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tony Anderson (President; Board Member)
- Mike Partin (Vice President; Board Member)
People named in this filing
- Tony Anderson (President; Board Member)
- Mike Partin (Vice President; Board Member)
- Ingrid Kessler (Secretary-Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose of the Glenn English National Leadership Cooperative Leadership Foundation is to encourage educational advancement and develop future leaders through the award of higher education scholarships to such eligible students - who through their experience and future goals - exhibit a desire to effect positive social change by embracing one or more of the cooperative values.
What it reported doing in 2024
1 Board meeting was held in 2024. The board approved and paid 5 scholarships awards to several students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.3%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 26.69; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.3% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.