The Giving Tree Family Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452920939
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Douglaston, NY, USA
Phone
7182886252
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,173
Expenses
$9,794
Assets
$85,084

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SANDIA LU (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • SANDIA LU (Vice President)
  • JUPING LI (Secretary)
  • WINNIE JU (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was established to have young people understand the poverty stricken and unfornate people around the world by providing financial assistance, food clothing and necessities. The giving tree family inc envents include food pantry, nursing home visits, ahrc visits, yard sale fund raising and water bottle recycling program.the giving tree family inc also interacts and cooperates with other organizations with similar purpose.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization was established to have young people understand the poverty stricken and unfornate people around the world by providing financial assistance, food clothing and necessities. The giving tree family inc evens include food pantry, nursing home visits, ahrc visits, yale sale and fund rasing and water bottle recycling program. The giving tree family inc also interacts and cooperates with other organizations with similar purpose.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 6.4%; rating input score 6
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 88.1%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.69; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 39.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 32.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 6.4% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 6/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.