The Giving Plate

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800553186
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Bend, OR, USA
Phone
5417976883
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food Banks, Pantries

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,116,264
Expenses
$2,545,467
Assets
$6,974,893
Liabilities
$549,395

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • RANAE STALEY (EXECUTIVE DIR.): $98,140 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Feeding the hungry today with compassion and hospitality

What it reported doing in 2024

The giving plate, inc. (tgp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing hunger relief with compassion and hospitality to food-insecure individuals and families across central Oregon. In 2024, tgp continued to reimagine food assistance by creating dignified, welcoming spaces that nourish both body and spirit.this year, we distributed 986,365 pounds of food to 94,562 individuals through all four of our hunger-relief programs, with 60% of those served being children under the age of 18. Through our grocery program, we supported 18,350 households, providing access to nutritious food in a market-style environment designed to uphold dignity and choice. Our kid's korner program provided 11,877 bags of food to children, giving them an opportunity to shop for their own food in a space designed just for them. The backpacks for bend program delivered 24,967 weekend food bags to approximately 750 k12 students, ensuring they had enough to eat when school was not in session.in addition to food support, tgp extended hope in tangible ways. We distributed 479 gas/propane cards valued at $30 each to individuals experiencing crisis and hardship. We also brought joy to our youngest guests through seasonal outreach: 514 easter baskets were gifted to children ages 112, and our annual jingle store welcomed 871 children from low-to-moderate income families. At this free holiday event, children met santa, buddy the elf, princesses, and more while shopping with $10 in jingle bucks to pick out meaningful gifts for loved ones.as we reflect on 2024, these accomplishments highlight our deep commitment to not only fighting hunger but also feeding hope, restoring dignity, and strengthening our community with love and care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.6%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $21.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.3%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.6% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $98K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.