The Girls Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
030383225
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
6198501583
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$39,214
Expenses
$7,770
Assets
$31,444
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joseph Tanner III (Vice President)
  • Felicia Sumler (President)

People named in this filing

  • Joseph Tanner III (Vice President)
  • Carmen Butler (Treasurer)
  • Sheri Carriere (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mentoring program for girls between the ages of 12-18. Our group mentoring program is designed from our organization's objectives, which are Love, Empowerment and Better You. It is designed to address critical tween & teen issues; issues such as the value of education and achievement, bullying, self-confidence, problem solving, nutrition and hygiene, leadership skills, friendships, financial literacy, and personal safety. It provides a support system for the participants involved. The program helps the mentee develop socially, as social skills will benefit the girls in all areas of their lives. The group mentoring sessions will include craft activities, interactive workshops, group exercises, speakers, tutoring, field trips, journaling, one-one mentor/mentee session, and community service projects.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our major accomplishments have been that more than 80 girls enrolled in our mentoring program. In our mentoring program we have observed positive changes in the girl's self-perception, increased self-confidence, and greater assertiveness in setting and achieving personal goals. Most have development of leadership skills and qualities among participants, demonstrated through leadership roles within the program, school, or community. Some of our previous mentees with our assistance have gone on to pursue higher education or have become entrepreneurs. These accomplishments collectively demonstrate the effectiveness and success of our program in fostering the holistic development of participants and preparing them for future success in various aspects of their lives. Mentoring program is for girls between the ages of 12-18, there were 10 girls enrolled in the program. Our group mentoring program is designed from our organization's objectives, which are Love, Empowerment and Better You. We have been able to provide free prom dresses, suits, haircuts, makeup and accessories for the past three years for more than 500 teens attending their prom. he Prom giveaway is a one-day annual event that provides free prom dresses, suits, and accessories to local high school young ladies and young men in need. This is a free, first come-first serve event to any high school student that needs prom attire. Our goal is to make sure every young lady and young man that wants to attend prom can do so no matter what their personal or financial hardships may be. We want each young person that attends our event to walk away having a sense of pride and self-confidence knowing they are going to look simply stunning at their prom. We not only provide dresses and suits/tux for prom night but also provide some accessories. All items may be either new or slightly used. These items are given to the young ladies and young men at no cost to them and remain theirs to keep. There are also hair stylists, barbers, makeup experts, and stylists to assist each young woman and young man with their grooming needs all free of charge.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 19.8%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 80.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.05; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 19.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.