The Girard Viking Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
721145557
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Metairie, LA, USA
Phone
5044815447
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,264
Expenses
$44,952
Assets
$39,997
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON BOYLE (PRESIDENT)
  • BILLY WISS (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIN SMITH (BOARD MEMBER)
  • RYAN ONEAL (BOARD MEMBER)
  • AMBER TRUETING (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This organization exists solely to provide assistance, manually and financially, to girard playground.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization provides volunteers and additional fundraising efforts to help support and maintain girard playground in jefferson parish, Louisiana. We provide uniforms, sports equipment, trophies, upgrades to the current facilities as needed, and volunteer hours to make sure every child has the same opportunity to succeed. These efforts are crucial to ensure the children have a safe, functional, and enjoyable time while participating in youth sports.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.5%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -40.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.