The George G Glenner Alzheimer's Family Centers Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 953794678
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chula Vista, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6195434700
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,446,165
- Expenses
- $3,667,441
- Assets
- $2,958,173
- Liabilities
- $2,982,666
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT J TARDE (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT J TARDE (CEO/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $207,983 total reported compensation
- FERNANDO MOSCOSO (CFO): $116,028 total reported compensation
- LISA TYBURSKI (CMO): $108,162 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The george g. Glenner alzheimer's family centers, inc. (the organization) was founded in 1982 and is a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code and has been a vocal advocate for alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The organization was incorporated under the nonprofit public benefit corporation laws of the state of California. The specific purposes of the organization are to provide quality adult day care and support services to families and others affected by alzheimer's and memory impairment diseases. The organization provides quality adult care programs, family support, information and referrals, case management, crisis intervention, family and community education, and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Day care services: the organization operates three day care centers in san diego county, providing day care for individuals with alzheimer's disease and related dementias. These centers help hundreds of individuals remain socially and physically active in loving home-like adult health centers, thus delaying premature institutional placement. Weekly family education services help families understand the disease and to support their role as caregiver. Additionally, collaborative partnerships with leading san diego institution s position the organization on the cutting edge of research, education, community, advocacy and care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.68 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.4%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.8%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.1% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $208K · 11 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $194K reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.