The Gabrielino-tongva Nation Community Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464492261
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
City of Industry, CA, USA
Phone
9518070479
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,565
Expenses
$7,488
Assets
$6,472
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EDWARD WHITE (PRESIDENT)
  • ADAM LOYA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EDWARD WHITE (PRESIDENT)
  • ADAM LOYA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SANDONNE GOAD (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our purpose is to improve housing, economic, and social conditions, by teaching and supporting the economic development of business entities owned and operated by residents of the greater los angeles basin, particularly of the gabrielino tongva native american community and other native american people.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tribal social solutions program - this is an informational newsletter that goes out quarterly to over 700 people. The newsletter covers where to find scholarships, business assistance, health care, housing improvements, and job opportunities. It also gives the quarterly meeting invitation, so everyone that is interested can come receive more information on these and other social issues facing the gabrielino-tongva people and other native american people of the greater los angeles basin

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40.8%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 52.1%; rating input score 52

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.7%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40.8% of revenue deployed · 52.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.