The Friends of the University of Miami Frost School of Music Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650201227
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
3052337760
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Expenses
$9,615
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUZANNE FLOYD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SUZANNE FLOYD (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To stimulate, support, sponsor and encourage activities and attitudes which further the goals and programs of the frost school of music of the university of miami for the benefit of the frost school and its students, faculty and staff, and members of the organization and of the south Florida community; to raise funds primarily for music scholarships, and to provide performance opportunities, for students of the frost school.

What it reported doing in 2014

Musicales are presented throughout the school year to raise funds for the scholarships given to the students in addition to providing the students the opportunity to plan and perform individually and in small groups before small discriminating audiences as well as the larger venues.balance of funds raised have been contributed to an endowed fund for music sholarships to be given to elgible students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 99.4%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -79% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -52.4% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.