The Friends of the High School for Leadership and Public Service Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133861112
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2017
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2129356020
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$58,147
Expenses
$52,194
Assets
$245,066

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Megan Hickey (President)
  • Elisabeth Dwyer (Vice President/Director)

People named in this filing

  • Megan Hickey (President)
  • Paul K Piccone (Treasurer)
  • Jerome Ryan (Budget Director/Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support Leadership and Public Service High School and its students through the promotion of higher education, the best possible career paths and the values of leadership and public service.

What it reported doing in 2018

Provided equipment for the high school. Provided supplies for students of the high school. Conducted collegecampus visits and mentor program for 61 students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 97.3%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.7; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 97.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $51K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.