The Free Library of New Hope & Solebury
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231494787
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- New Hope, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2158622330
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $423,608
- Expenses
- $366,182
- Assets
- $3,109,612
- Liabilities
- $11,058
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACY GEIER SMITH (PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN MELLON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SAM PHARO (DIRECTOR): $79,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sharing knowledge; enriching lives
What it reported doing in 2025
The free library of new hope and solebury is a pa forward gold star library that has provided excellent library services to the public for over 100 years. Users are granted free and equal access to a large collection of children's and adult books, audiobooks, dvds, newspapers, and magazines. Additionally, the library offers a non-traditional collection of an online e-library, business and consumer databases, museum passes, preloaded tablets, kindles and s.t.e.a.m. Kits. Free wireless access and public use computers as well as educational and entertaining programming for all ages round out the offerings. As a member of the bucks county library system, the library has reciprocal borrowing privileges with other area libraries and across the country, which enhances its user services. See schedule o for addtl info. A professional staff provides reference guidance, reader's advisory services and computer assistance.additional information on programming -the summer reading program (srp): spread over three months, the srp served over 1,700 children and adults through june, july and august by hosting art with anita, the da vinci science center, lolly hopwood and the play patrol company, among other regular programs like weekly storytime and children's yoga.our adult crafting program series, including embroidery, knitting, felting, adult writers group and autobiographical journaling, served approximately 100 patrons a month and are now established as recurring monthly or biweekly programs.the tween/teen program expansion was made to include a chess club, nerd studio, magic the gathering club and a pokemon lunch club. These programs collectively served 40 tweens/teens a week during the height of summer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $18.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.6%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.49; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $273K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $80K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.