The Florida Citrus Heritage Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261445151
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Bartow, FL, USA
- Phone
- 8636821111
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,514
- Expenses
- $77,429
- Assets
- $160,792
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE HAMNER (PRESIDENT)
- HUGH ENGLISH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KRISTI JOYNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- GEORGE HAMNER (PRESIDENT)
- HUGH ENGLISH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- W LINDSAY RALEY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The citrus hall of fame of Florida, inc. Has been established as a means to honor those distinguished leaders that have made significant contributions to the Florida citrus industry
What it reported doing in 2025
The citrus hall of fame of Florida, inc. Hosts an annual awards luncheon honoring those industry leaders that have made significant contributions to the Florida citrus industry. It also conducted the miss Florida citrus pageant.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 26%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 47.8%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.08; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 29.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 26% of revenue deployed · 47.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $37K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.