The Felix Rutledge Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 431193722
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7137450973
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,000
- Expenses
- $20,836
- Assets
- $358,324
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Premal Thaker (President)
- Susan Modesitt (Past President)
- Matthew Schlumbrecht (President Elect)
People named in this filing
- Premal Thaker (President)
- Susan Modesitt (Past President)
- Matthew Schlumbrecht (President Elect)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Felix Rutledge Society ("the Society") is composed of graduates of the gynecologic oncology fellowship program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The Society strives to encourage the sharing of new developments in gynecologic oncology, stimulate original investigation in gynecological oncology and related fields, promote clinical investigation, discuss innovative ideas and techniques of teaching in gynecologic oncology, and promote fellowship among members.
What it reported doing in 2025
Every other year the Society hosts an educational meeting for members and guests. This is typically a three-day scientific meeting attended by 75-100 health care providers and awards continuing medical education credits for attendees. The meeting is organized by members of the Society in conjunction with the Continuing Medical Education office of the host institution. The next meeting will be held in 2026. Ninety-five percent of the Society's time is allocated to planning and preparing for the meetings.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.5%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 46.7%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -48.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.2; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 51.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -173.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.9% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.5% of revenue deployed · 46.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.