The Farmer's Table Ct Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992567086
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Cornwall Bridge, CT, USA
Phone
8608688087
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,964
Expenses
$25,291
Assets
$161,530
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HOWARD ROSENFELD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HOWARD ROSENFELD (PRESIDENT)
  • BEN PALETSKY (DIRECTOR)
  • HELEN BARTLETT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The farmer's table ct, inc. (farmer's table) operates as a network for farmers. Our initiatives include providing educational resources, facilitating networking opportunities, and offering market assistance to equip farmers with the tools for success. The farmer's table helps farmers connect to food security programs in the communities in which it operates.through-community education and -outreach efforts, the farmers table brings awareness to the resources of local farmers and their positive effect in our communities by providing fresh, healthy and nutritious food.the farmer's table provides educational opportunities to farmers on emerging issues and topics to help meet the challenges impacting agriculture now and in the future.

What it reported doing in 2025

Farming in a changing environment seminar. The event provided insights and lessons from local farmers and regional experts about climate-related farming challenges. Bringing awareness to the work that farmers and other nonprofit partners are doing to find solutions or adaptive strategies.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 8
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.9%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 16.7%; rating input score 17

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 82.4%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.39; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 101.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 116.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.9% of revenue deployed · 16.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.