The Fargo-moorhead Coalition for Homeless Persons
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 412198589
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fargo, ND, USA
- Phone
- 7019367171
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $140,790
- Expenses
- $185,773
- Assets
- $206,057
- Liabilities
- $6,946
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- ASHLEY LITTLEWOLF (CHAIR)
- JAN ELIASSEN (VICE CHAIR)
- MICHAELA SLETMOE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to work in partnership to achieve permanent solutions to prevent, reduce and end homelessness by offering educational workshops, hosting annual events that serve the homeless and at-risk members of the community, and promoting resource connections.
What it reported doing in 2024
We work to share with our community relevant information, statistics, and current issues. Our work is rooted in believing housing is a human right and we collaborate to design responses to injustice. We advocate to our leaders at the local, state, and federal levels concerning policy and funding that impacts our partners and our collective work. We seek to advance affordable housing and create opportunities for people to thrive so that everone has a safe place to call home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $164K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.