The Family Summit Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870506755
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ogden, UT, USA
- Phone
- 8014761127
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $92,411
- Expenses
- $110,870
- Assets
- $1,291
- Liabilities
- $182,311
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- TRACY FRANKLIN (TRUSTEE)
- DR JOHN HEMMERSMEIER (TRUSTEE)
- BRANDON JONES (BOARD CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A center for grieving children is a support center for children, teens and their families that are grieving the loss of someone they love because of death, divorce or separation. We also help children who are in foster care, children and teens experiencing complicated grief, and those with anticipatory grief (children with a loved one who is dying).
What it reported doing in 2024
The family summit foundation-a center for grieving children held 50 separate support groups. In all, we directly impacted the lives of nearly 800 children and teens throughout the year. We consistently had from 3 to 6 new family intakes every week. During the year 2024 we had a total of 148 volunteers that participated at our center and camp comfort. All new volunteers are trained on child, teen and adult grief issues. With the number of families that are using our services it has become imperative that we continually recruit and train new volunteers. Twice during the year, we had a candle lighting ceremony. We held one for memorial day and another at christmas time. Our families that have had a loss from death came together and one by-one lit a candle in memory of their loved ones, while saying who they were and something special about them. Our camp comfort was held in july. We had 53 children and teens participate in 2024. We had separate camp days according to age and type of loss. Our youth and teen day camps were held at the ogden nature center. We had a barbecue along with many fun activities for the kids, which made it a very memorable day. During the christmas holiday the children and teens decorated ornaments they made to honor the person they loved that died. The children and teens took great thought and pride in making their ornaments. We used clear plastic bulbs in which the youth placed mementos, pictures, and items that reminded them of their special person. In the spring we had a balloon release. Children and teens in our divorce/separation and foster care groups used this activity to "let go" of their hard feelings. They wrote or drew about feelings that were hard for them. We then attached them to balloons and they were released together symbolically. The children and teens that had a loved one die released their balloons ceremoniously with a special note or picture to their loved one. We were able to impact the lives of children, teens and families with our workshops and presentations. These provided education and training on grief and the grief process for community agencies, schools, social workers, and other professionals. Our educational presentations for the year had a total of 195 people in attendance. Our community awareness presentations had 220.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 141.22; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.