The Family Place Public Charter School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822183067
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022650149
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,317,999
- Expenses
- $2,505,792
- Assets
- $10,192,942
- Liabilities
- $2,813,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- HALEY WIGGINS (EXECUTIVE DI): $177,706 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the family place public charter school is to improve the literacy and workplace skills of low-income limited english proficient adults in the district so that they and their family are self-sustaining, employable and engaged in their community.
What it reported doing in 2024
The three educational pathways are: 1. Esl life and work skills: we offer three different proficiency levels to meet the english needs of our students in the context of their daily lives and work situations. At the basic literacy and lower proficiency levels, our program focuses on developing the language skills needed for day-to-day activities such as going to the doctor, taking the bus, shopping, and/or managing money. As the students gain english proficiency, instruction shifts to higher-level skills such as job-specific vocabulary, workforce development language, and critical thinking strategies. We use the sheltered instruction model that integrates language and content instruction together in the classroom. The curriculum is organized into thematic units at each level that align with the casas life skills competencies and uses the casas content standards to identify the underlying language skills students need at each proficiency level. During the 2024-2025 school year, the family place public charter school offered eleven esl classes ranging from beginning, intermediate, to advanced in three different time slots - morning, afternoon, and evening. 2.foundations of literacy: this program is offered in partnership with the mexican consulate. It is an adult basic education program for native spanish speakers who are marginally literate in their native language. This program focuses on students' attainment of native language literacy which as research indicates helps them succeed in esl classes. The foundations of literacy program model is individualized and meets students at their literacy level, which ranges from learning the alphabet to completing specific grade-level equivalencies. As students pass the benchmarks in this program, they can earn an elementary and/or secondary diploma. Foundations of literacy is offered daily in the morning and evening sessions. 3.child development associate (cda): our child development associate (cda) program prepares learners for jobs in the early childhood education field. The cda credential is based on a core set of national competency standards, which guide early childcare professionals as they work toward becoming qualified teachers of young children. The course is a 600-hour bilingual training program that prepares students to succeed on the national credentialing exam to become certified cdas. Cdas enter the labor market at above minimum wage jobs and are able to access more advanced training over the course of their careers in child development. Cda training is offered in four areas: infants-toddlers; preschoolers; family childcare, and home visiting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.3%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 52.9%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.07; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 40.9% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.3% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $178K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.