The Family Lifeline Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752984224
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Rio Rancho, NM, USA
Phone
5058911846
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,262
Expenses
$125,921
Assets
$17,673
Liabilities
$14,943

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL HOLLAND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL A SCHAEFER (PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREA ROGERS (VICE PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • REBECCA HOLLAND (PROJECT DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL HOLLAND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MICHAEL A SCHAEFER (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote healthy and sustainable marriages by providing education and training throughout the community.

What it reported doing in 2013

The organization's programs are designed to inform and encourage healthy marriages as well as offer abstinence education. The organization offers private and group mentoring in addition to workshops and seminars. Approximate couples assisted-350 approximate individuals assisted-80

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 72.7%; rating input score 73

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.85; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -36.1% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 72.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $91K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.