The Family Health Centers of Georgia, Inc.
Legal name: The Family Health Centers of Georgia Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581233448
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, United States
- Phone
- 404.756.6874
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $27,370,938
- Expenses
- $28,329,011
- Assets
- $13,314,681
- Liabilities
- $9,255,491
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL W BROOKS MD MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- WILLIAM T BLEDSOE MBA CPA (SR VICE PRESIDENT/CFO)
- LINDA ABBOTT (VICE PRESIDENT/HR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL W BROOKS MD MBA (PRESIDENT/CEO): $783,779 total reported compensation
- WILLIAM T BLEDSOE MBA CPA (SR VICE PRESIDENT/CFO): $587,542 total reported compensation
- LINDA ABBOTT (VICE PRESIDENT/HR): $412,520 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Family Health Centers of Georgia provides comprehensive, high quality, patient-centered healthcare to the communities we serve, with a commitment to excellence. a woman with her hand on her face. We are glad you chose The Family Health Centers of Georgia, Inc. as your provider of choice and medical home. The Patient Guide to our Services / Guia de Servicios para nuestros Pacientes is designed to assist you with understanding what will happen before, during and after your visit. We pledge to provide you with quality healthcare that is delivered in a clean and safe environment. Translation, Interpretation & Handicap Accessibility We care about the support services that you may need to make your appointment a success. We provide professional translation and interpretation services to help you navigate. Translation services are available for Spanish, French and multiple other languages.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization operated a community based clinic which had 51,113 visits for the year ended may 31, 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.5%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.7; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 83.8% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $784K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $2.5M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.