The Family Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621237360
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153332644
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Counseling
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,957,843
- Expenses
- $1,897,750
- Assets
- $878,924
- Liabilities
- $112,058
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN M GALEAS (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN M GALEAS (PRESIDENT &): $136,013 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Raising resilience Tennessee's (formerly known as the family center, inc.) mission is breaking multigenerational cycles of childhood trauma and our vision is a resilient community where all children thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
Raising resilience Tennessee's (formerly known as the family center, inc.) mission is breaking intergenerational cycles of childhood trauma. Its vision is creating resilient communities where all children thrive. Since 1985, raising resilience Tennessee has served middle Tennessee with programs that help prevent and mitigate childhood trauma including abuse and neglect. It is licensed and accredited as a Tennessee child abuse prevention agency and has locations in nashville and murfreesboro. During the 2024/2025 fiscal year, the organization served 740 adults and impacted the lives of 912 children (39 directly) through our family resilience programs; 912 professionals received training/coaching through our organizational resilience efforts. Empowering families and our community to create safe, stable, nurturing relationships is key to ensuring children have necessary opportunities to become resilient adults (emotionally, psychologically, and physically). Raising resilience Tennessee utilizes evidence-based and research informed curricula that enhance understanding of developmental stages, brain development, adverse childhood experiences/adverse community environments (aces), trauma informed frameworks, parent/child attachment, enhanced family communication, and positive discipline techniques, etc. To achieve our mission. Family resilience programs offer parents (including non- custodial parents, guardians, and others) groups and 1:1 family coaching enhancing skills, behaviors, and overall parenting practices. Most families served are considered vulnerable due to family histories including addiction, incarceration, poverty, discrimination, racism, and family violence. Our programs offer hope in breaking cycles of trauma. Our organizational resilience training and coaching uses samhsa approved and other evidence-based curricula to provide staff in courts, jails, government agencies, businesses, and other nonprofits with information on and skills related to becoming trauma informed. These are often organizations with which the families we serve interact and ensuring those interactions occur through an empathetic awareness helps increase positive outcomes. Earlier in the fiscal year the board recognized potential challenges related to funding and created a sustainability committee. This group recommended several adjustments to home in what we do best as an organization, recognizing shifts in revenue streams, including focusing internal resources on programming with historical impact, specifically our family resilience efforts. This resulted in sundowning organizational resilience. We also learned in april, 2025 that our government funding (dhs, dcs) was not being renewed. This required laying off staff at the end of june and a fy26 budget at 50% of the fy25 budget. In spite of the challenges, we remained focused on finding light during a dark space for nonprofits across the country and are grateful to those who remained committed to positively impacting children's futures.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.5%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.46; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.5% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 26 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.