The Exchange Clubs Child Abuse Prevention Center in Durham Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581978668
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Durham, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9194038249
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,473,092
- Expenses
- $1,405,984
- Assets
- $525,743
- Liabilities
- $238,032
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN GRIFFIN (BOARD PRESIDENT)
- MYCA JETER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- KELLY THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LEAH SANTIBANEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY THOMPSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $85,895 total reported compensation
- LEAH SANTIBANEZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $65,706 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make children's lives better by strengthening their families, teachers, and communities through proven counseling, coaching, and training.
What it reported doing in 2023
The family support program provided coaching and family therapy primarily in family homes and natural environments, as well as at the offices listed above or virtually when needed. Services may include siblings to eliminate the need for child care. Services are available in spanish and english through efc staff or, when necessary, through an interpreter in other languages.the family support program utilizes evidence-based and research-supported approaches, including parent child interaction therapy, triple p, abc, safe care, case management, and attachment and bio-behavioral catch-up. Families receiving services included caregivers and children impacted through therapeutic intervention and support.case management services include, but are not limited to, connection to local resources, information about community-based supports, referrals to appropriate services, assistance with accessing resources and services, concrete support to meet basic needs, and client family team meeting facilitation. Case management services may be provided over the phone or in person during a parent education session. Not all families receiving case management services also receive parent education services. The primary pcft involved in case coordination is trained in cft facilitation.upon completion of services, participants demonstrate improved understanding and use of nurturing and effective strategies to mediate child behavior or stress, including positive behavior management techniques. Participants increase their awareness of available community resources and supports and demonstrate knowledge of the importance of spending positive, intentional time interacting with their children. Families receiving services are better equipped to access concrete supports that strengthen family functioning and overall stability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 79% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 84.7%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $14.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 84.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.