The Exchange Club Parent Child Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521593358
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Hagerstown, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3017912224
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $141,265
- Expenses
- $122,049
- Assets
- $224,858
- Liabilities
- $38,665
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID BELLIOTTI (PRESIDENT)
- MILLIE LOWMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- DAVID BELLIOTTI (PRESIDENT)
- JOE CONSOLETTI (VICE PRES)
- MELODIE DAVIS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Education re: child abuse prevention
What it reported doing in 2015
To recruit, train and place volunteer parent aides with parents who are at risk of abusing and/or neglecting their children and to disseminate information regarding the signs which indicate child abuse.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.6%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $122K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2012 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.