The End Fund
Legal name: The End Fund Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273941186
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- New York City, NY, United States
- Phone
- +1 646 690 9775
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,672,882
- Expenses
- $74,181,557
- Assets
- $38,929,869
- Liabilities
- $2,786,090
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANA BENTON SCHECHTER (COO / BOARD SECRETARY (thru June 15, 2024) INTERIM CEO (as of June 15, 2024))
- ELLEN AGLER (CEO thru June 15, 2024)
Highest reported compensation
- DIANA BENTON SCHECHTER (COO / BOARD SECRETARY (thru June 15, 2024) INTERIM CEO (as of June 15, 2024)): $435,426 total reported compensation
- DANIEL DALEY (SR VP of Finance and Admin (thru June 15, 2024), Acting COO (as of June 15, 2024)): $376,958 total reported compensation
- ELLEN AGLER (CEO thru June 15, 2024): $317,236 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a collaborative fund dedicated to ending six neglected tropical diseases that affect more than 1.4 billion people.
What it reported doing in 2024
The END Fund is a leading philanthropic community dedicated to ending six neglected tropical diseases that impact 1.65 billion people globally: intestinal worms, schistosomiasis, lymphatic filariasis, river blindness, trachoma, and visceral leishmaniasis. The END Fund efficiently puts private capital to work, advocating for neglected tropical disease programs that are innovative, integrated and cost-effective. We facilitate strong partnerships with the private sector, government partners, and local programmatic partners to collaboratively support national disease programs. This is done through a proven implementation model that is tailored to meet the needs of individual countries. The END Fund was established as a new model, the first of its kind in the neglected tropical disease field: a philanthropic fund that increases resources, coordination, and collaboration toward the goal of ending neglected tropical diseases, thereby reducing the physical, social, economic, and systemic impact of these diseases for hundreds of millions of people. Our model is designed to mobilize resources to close the neglected tropical disease funding gap through partnerships with global philanthropists and private-sector investors. By pooling funds, the END Fund helps activist-philanthropists make outsized impacts with their investments. Through collaboration with our programmatic partners, we help deliver treatment at scale, accelerate innovations that improve the efficiency of drug delivery, provide program oversight to monitor quality and impact, and bring together partners, advocates, and investors. Because we direct resources and training activities through local partners, who know the landscape and can go where international agencies cannot or will not, we operate successfully and with measurable impact in some of the world's most challenging environments due to war or instability. Our focus has always been on large-scale change and we are committed to investing in and alongside local governments, building in-country technical tools and skills, and incorporating neglected tropical diseases into national health agendas for solid local ownership. In close partnership with stakeholders across the global neglected tropical disease community, the END Fund: Identified gaps and opportunities, by understanding investment needs and gaps in funding for neglected tropical diseases, landscapes investable opportunities, and increases coordination among stakeholders. The END Fund also builds coalitions, by mobilizing and activating collaboration among country-level stakeholders, including ministries of health, programmatic partners, investors, etc. The END Fund designs programs by working with ministries of health and programmatic partners to expand data collection, mapping, and sector knowledge in order to identify compelling program opportunities. The END Fund trains partners by aiming to grow and strengthen the pool of partner organizations to assist local governments in the implementation of quality neglected tropical disease programs. The END Fund manages grants and provides technical support by conducting country program visits and provides partner support, technical assistance, and training as needed. In 2024, the END Fund supported the distribution of 247,323,479 NTD treatments with 152,630,533 people treated across 21 countries by 27 implementing partners. During the same period, 38,100 surgeries were conducted in 12 countries by 15 implementing partners and 1,198,935 health care workers trained across 24 countries by 31 implementing partners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $435K · 15 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.6M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 38 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 5 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.