The Emmanuel Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 881338984
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Riverside, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9518487441
- Rating
- 24
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Temporary Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $415,061
- Expenses
- $377,319
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUAN CORNELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SALOTE TUPOU (CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JUAN CORNELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $16,096 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At nbsp; the nbsp; emmanuel nbsp; project nbsp; our nbsp; mission nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; provide nbsp; compassionate nbsp; and nbsp; high-quality nbsp; recuperative nbsp; care nbsp; services nbsp; to nbsp; individuals nbsp; recovering nbsp; from nbsp; acute nbsp; medical nbsp; conditions nbsp; and nbsp; injuries nbsp; while nbsp; also nbsp; playing nbsp; a nbsp; pivotal nbsp; role nbsp; in nbsp; reducing nbsp; hospital nbsp; cost nbsp; we nbsp; are nbsp; dedicated nbsp; to nbsp; enhancing nbsp; the nbsp; overall nbsp; well-being nbsp; of nbsp; our nbsp; residents nbsp; and nbsp; promoting nbsp; a nbsp; more nbsp; sustainable nbsp; and nbsp; cost-effective nbsp; healthcare nbsp; environment
What it reported doing in 2025
At the emmanuel project our mission is to provide compassionate and high-quality recuperative care services to individuals recovering from acute medical conditions and injuries while also playing a pivotal role in reducing hospital cost. We are dedicated to enhancing the overall well-being of our residents and promoting a more sustainable and cost-effective healthcare environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $16K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 10 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.