The Emmada Institute of Behavioral Health & Wellness

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
810894071
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-PF 2016, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
8552559366
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,850
Expenses
$208,594
Assets
$9,939
Liabilities
$75,166

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICK WILLIAMSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/ OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • RICK WILLIAMSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/ OFFICER)
  • STEVE TARVER (BOARD CHAIRMAN/DIRECTOR)
  • KATHY WILLIAMSON (VICE CHAIR/DIRECOTR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To connect with our vulnerable in seasons of adversity to bring about a better day

What it reported doing in 2025

To provide creative and compassionate, empircallydriven mental health & outreach servicies that areaccessible & rooted in an inclusive, cross cultrual understanding of wellness

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 16
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 16.7%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 14

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.56; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -29.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 16.7% of revenue deployed · 13.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.