The Eden Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731506566
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Norman, OK, USA
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $307,984
- Expenses
- $237,132
- Assets
- $292,747
- Liabilities
- $180,016
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHELLE BOWDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MICHELLE BOWDEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $35,806 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To empower women and men with alternatives to abortion by providing free medical services, accurate information and necessary resource support; to build strong families through education, practical and emotional support; to provide compassionate after-abortion support.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Eden Clinic provided free medical services to women and men facing unplanned pregnancies or seeking reproductive health support. In 2025, the clinic served 389 distinct clients through 524 medical visits. Services included 363 free pregnancy tests, 323 ultrasounds, 114 STD test batteries, and treatment when indicated. Comprehensive information about next steps for a healthy pregnancy and fetal development was also provided for 211 pregnant women. Education program participants received practical instruction on healthy pregnancy, child development, newborn care, and healthy parenting relationships. 330 hours of parenting education were delivered to 75 individuals across 364 appointments and 133 clients received essential baby care items throughout the mothers pregnancy and first year of babys life. All services were free and offered in a compassionate, confidential environment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.4%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 31.6%; rating input score 32
- Fundraising efficiency: $119.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.23; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.61; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.4% of revenue deployed · 31.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $36K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.