The Dry Farming Institute

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843400072
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Corvallis, OR, USA
Phone
5037395985
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Food, Agriculture, and Nutrition N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$421,668
Expenses
$182,693
Assets
$258,205
Liabilities
$6,799

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LUCAS NEBERT (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY GARRETT (DIRECTOR): $82,069 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We support growers exploration of dry farming and other water resilient agricultural practices through collaborative projects, outreach, and education.

What it reported doing in 2025

Our farm: a living laboratory for dry farming innovation our farm sites serve as a living laboratory for hands-on experimentation and educational demonstration. From crop variety trials and seed stewardship to soil health and water conservation strategies, our land-based work generates practical insights that ground and inform all we do . Our work: technical assistance for exploring water resilience we partner with growers, agricultural advisors, and researchers, primarily in the maritime pacific northwest, to co-create low-input, water-resilient solutions that fit local contexts and challenges. Flexible, collaborative projects dfi is operating through a flexible, project-by-project model. This nimble approach allows us to test ideas and work with highly motivated partners on initiatives ranging from educational storytelling and workshops to technical support for demonstration farms. Each project is tailored to meet growers where they are and share whats learned with broader networks. 2025 projects storytelling for impact: case studies were capturing the stories of growers who are navigating water uncertainty with creativity and building resilience in the face of water uncertainty. These case studies help translate innovation into action and foster connection across regions. Well be sharing these stories online, in community-centered presentations, and alongside partners who are helping to spread the word. Virtual water resilience workshops these interactive sessions bring together ag professionals and growers across the west coast to explore tailored water strategies, share knowledge, and build peer-to-peer networks. A water resilience toolkit the dry farming institute (dfi) is developing a practical, grower-centered toolkit that provides clear, actionable steps for exploring and implementing water-resilient strategies on farms. This toolkit is based off of a decade plus of collaborative participatory research started at Oregon state university and continued exploratory trials with dfi.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 29.5%; rating input score 29
  • Program expense ratio: 67.2%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $242.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 56.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 44.9%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 82.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 159.2% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 29.5% of revenue deployed · 67.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $82K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.