Health Care Clinic
Legal name: The Douglas County Community Health Clinic Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391253461
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Superior, WI, USA
- Phone
- (715) 394-4117
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $355,100
- Expenses
- $336,861
- Assets
- $578,277
- Liabilities
- $27,413
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- HEATHER WILLCOXON (EXECUTIVE DI): $81,070 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering communities through specialized and inclusive reproductive health services. OUR VISION. For more than four decades Health Care Clinic has been providing essential reproductive and sexual health care services. With clinics located in Superior and Ashland, we offer confidential and affordable services to all individuals. Our knowledgeable staff provides specialized and comprehensive services rooted in dignity and inclusivity to ensure the health of you, your family, and your community. Services: Preventive Health.
What it reported doing in 2024
Health care clinic (hcc) empowers communities through specialized and inclusive reproductive services. Hcc envisions a world in which all people have access to just and dignified reproductive health care. Our commitment to our patients is to provide individualized healthcare based on the patient's individual needs. We pride ourselves on providing exceptional reproductive health services to the community. Our staff works closely with each patient to achieve and maintain health goals.in 2024, health care clinic (hcc) provided low or no cost reproductive health and family planning services to a total of 198 unduplicated patients.for more than 40 years hcc has provided the most up-to-date, evidence-based care. Hcc follows the Wisconsin department of health services women's health-family planning/reproductive health program guidelines (2022) and the Wisconsin family planning and reproductive health association's reproductive health best practice guidelines (2021). Our medical team also works under the united states medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use (us mec, 2023) and providing quality family planning services - recommendations from the cdc and the us office of population affairs (2023). All these resources ensure best practices are followed at each visit.evidence-based medicine has proven that access to contraceptive supplies and services lowers the number of unintended pregnancies. Access to reproductive health services to successfully achieve a patient's wishes with regards to their reproductive life plan (number of children, birth spacing, etc.) is a human right. Before true gender equality can be achieved, women need access to comprehensive, reproductive health care. Hcc is proud to offer these services to the people in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.3%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $54.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.1%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 79.3% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $278K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.