The Disability Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311725978
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dayton, OH, USA
- Phone
- 9372259939
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $516,812
- Expenses
- $330,716
- Assets
- $1,406,185
- Liabilities
- $8,916
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Jill Koorndyk (Trustee): $124,595 total reported compensation
- Gregory D Darling (Executive Dir.): $102,298 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide benefits to individuals with disabilities by making distributions which do not jeopardize entitlements
What it reported doing in 2024
Once again, it is a pleasure to present our annual report. Fiscal Year 2025 was year of growth as we welcomed 169 new participants to our family of trusts. We grew to 958 active accounts in 56 Ohio counties (up from 51 in 2024.)We take our nonprofit role very seriously. We are here to help our community by assisting in understanding options to protect public benefits. We have a responsibility to educate. Our reach is continually growing as we expand across Ohio. Every week we hear from families, providers and attorneys who need a pooled special needs trust that come to us because they trust us. They hear from their peers that we are easy to work with, listen to their questions seriously and fulfill our fiduciary responsibilities to protect their trust to make sure they are used in accordance with regulations, protecting their ability for quality of life.Deposits to accounts totaled 9.3 million dollars, putting our beneficiaries funds under the protection of our trusts. The careful administration of the trusts is always our focus, as we distributed 5 million dollars back to our beneficiarys benefit.As you review the information in our report, we hope you will see why we are proud of the work we do and how it helps enrich the lives of our beneficiaries. Our trusts foster independence; help create a sense of security and combat isolation. Our investment trustee, KeyBank, demonstrates that same dedication in their fiduciary role. The ability to make a deposit into a trust at a local KeyBank branch is a tremendous benefit afforded to our partners.We remain tremendously grateful to the attorneys, financial advisors, families, individuals living with disabilities, professional organizations, probate courts, advocacy groups, and other foundations we serve. The work we do is a collective effort, and there is much to be grateful for this year.2025 Highlights We are now in 56 counties across Ohio, up from 51 last year. Created instructional videos How to Read the KeyBank Statement and How to Request a Distribution and placed them on our website. Marketing materials have been updated with critical information and a fresher look. For the first time since 2005 (20 years ago) we revised our fee schedule. Although it necessitated a small increase, it assures our service viability for many years to come.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.8%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.25; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.8% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $282K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.