The Diamond Valley Arts Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202299581
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Hemet, CA, USA
Phone
9516605798
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arts Council/Agency

Reported finances

Revenue
$114,425
Expenses
$115,093
Assets
$20,400

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LOIS STIPP (President)
  • JASON STRAIN (Vice President)
  • RICHARD LEITZ (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LOIS STIPP (President)
  • JASON STRAIN (Vice President)
  • ANNA ANCHETTA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See sch o

What it reported doing in 2018

The purpose as a nonprofit 501(C)(3) entity corporation under the Stete of California, is to promote awareness of and encourage greater participation inthe various arts and cultural opportunities in the region.Additionally, a) Toprovide the planning, oversight, and funding reguired to ensure and support a vibrant arts and cultural environment in the community. b) To serve as a proactive resource for independent groups in advancing the arts and culture through media coverage. c) To partner with agencies, both public and private, in developing programs programs and creating opportunities that will enrich the cultural, economic, and intellectual life of the community .

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.