The Derryfield School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020265542
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Manchester, NH, USA
Phone
6036694524
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,900,596
Expenses
$20,887,451
Assets
$50,389,091
Liabilities
$14,730,936

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • ANDREW CHAPPELL (HEAD OF SCHOOL/TRUSTEE): $385,858 total reported compensation
  • SCOTT MCPHERSON (CHIEF FINANCE AND OPERATIO): $209,595 total reported compensation
  • FRANK BRANDT (ASSISTANT HEAD OF ACADEMIC): $151,743 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The derryfield school inspires bright, motivated young people to be their best and provides them with the skills and experiences needed to be valued, dynamic, confident, and purposeful members of any community.

What it reported doing in 2024

The derryfield school has hosted breakthrough manchester on campus for the past 34 years. Everyone is a teacher and a learner at breakthrough! With three and a half decades of a unique, proven students-teaching-students dual mission, breakthrough manchester is a leader in educational equity and access. Breakthrough narrows the opportunity gap by providing educational experiences that empower scholars traditionally underrepresented on college campuses to achieve post-secondary success. Breakthrough also trains aspiring high school and college-aged leaders as future educators, thereby strengthening and diversifying the teacher pipeline. The six-week summer program for manchester middle school scholars is the foundation of breakthrough's six-year college access program, focusing on rigorous academic enrichment combined with summer camp fun. Manchester students include: 68% will be first-generation college graduates 90% identify as students of color 64% qualify for free/reduced lunch 32% live with an alternative head of household (single parent, relative, foster) 84% speak a language other than english at homethe summer fills in gaps from the previous school year and equips middle school scholars with skills for success in the year ahead. College-aged teaching fellows mentor middle schoolers, adding creative twists in math, science, literature, and writing. After core classes each morning, there are extracurricular activities, such as chinese, music, sports, and mythology, followed by community-building activities. During the 7th and 8th-grade school years, scholars participate in super saturdays. High school juniors and seniors serve as teachers and mentors, and complement the summer and school learning with additional academic explorations. In high school, scholars participate in breakthrough college-bound, hosted at southern New Hampshire university, with a focus on college admission, including campus visits, application tips, financial aid workshops, writing a college essay, and more. Breakthrough scholar outcomes: breakthrough students made significant strides in learning. Eighty percent (80%) of students grew or maintained their reading skills, and 74% of students maintained or improved their math skills last summer; a remarkable achievement given that nationally, most students lose two months of math skills over the summer, and those with fewer resources often lose three. A school counselor from a local manchester high school shared, "we have sometimes found that incoming freshmen who have participated in breakthrough make tremendous gains over the summer, and our original academic placement for them is no longer the right fit". After breakthrough's middle school program, 100% of our students enroll in breakthrough college-bound at southern New Hampshire university, and 100% of breakthrough alumni pursue higher education, with 98% attending 4-year colleges. Breakthrough alumni are persisting at higher rates than comparison groups and graduating from college, but they also exceed the national college graduation average for all students. There are many stories of breakthrough students, now college graduates, pursuing their passions in the workforce as engineers, lawyers, doctors, educators, and more. Teaching fellow outcomes: over the past three summers, 78% of our teaching fellows (14 of the 18 who have graduated from college) launched careers in education. Many commit to teaching students from underrepresented communities, where compassionate teachers are needed the most. In fact, at the end of this summer, a teaching fellow shared, "breakthrough has truly changed my perspective on my life so much that i am now considering a career in the political science or international relations field because i am interested in social justice. I truly felt like i was a part of a great movement last summer, and that my daily efforts as a teacher were furthering my students' access to educational resources." school year: to keep our schol

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.41; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.6%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $386K · 24 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 39 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.