The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994723159
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Jonesboro, AR, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Specialized Education Institutions

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,267
Expenses
$143,554
Assets
$34,713
Liabilities
$10,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AIMEE MCDONALD (President)
  • KRISTI DURHAM (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • AIMEE MCDONALD (President)
  • KRISTI DURHAM (Vice President)
  • CHRISTY HOUSE (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To impart to the next generation of learners the knowledge, skills, and abilities to know and lead themselves in all/any/ever changing environments.

What it reported doing in 2024

In its inaugural year, The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain provided individualized educational programming and therapeutic support to 86 learners aged 419 diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or autism spectrum disorder. Students were referred by public schools, physicians, and parents seeking a structured, adaptive environment designed to promote functional independence and psychosocial growth. Each learner received personalized instruction and access to therapeutic interventions, including speech-language therapy, occupational therapy, and mental health services, coordinated through in-house and partner providers. These services directly advance the organizations exempt purpose of supporting the academic, cognitive, and social development of children with neurodevelopmental differences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.