The Day School at Baltimore Hebrew Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521843623
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2013
- Official website data refreshed
- Jun 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Baltimore, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4107641867
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $453,256
- Expenses
- $68,630
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAT WHITLOCK (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- DR LOUIS SHPRITZ (PRESIDENT)
- RABBI FLOYD HERMAN (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- AIMEE ADASHEK (LIFE TIME MEMBER)
- ALLAN T HIRSH III (LIFE TIME MEMBER)
- ANDREA VOEGLEIN (LIFE TIME MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The day school at baltimore hebrew, inc. Is a dynamic learning community that cultivates the intellectual, spiritual, moral, and physical development of each individual. Our goal is to provide students with tools for lifelong learning and with an appreciation of their jewish american heritage.
What it reported doing in 2013
Operation of an independent day school
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 42
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 15.1%; rating input score 15
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 84.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -25.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 15.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 15/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.