The Dallas Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752890371
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Dallas, TX, US
Phone
214.741.9898
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$159,979,237
Expenses
$102,960,710
Assets
$491,515,408
Liabilities
$36,172,168

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELLE SCHNEIDER (VICE PRESIDENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY)

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIE DIAZ (EXECUTIVE VP & COO): $532,125 total reported compensation
  • TORREY LITTLETON (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $290,738 total reported compensation
  • GARY GARCIA (SR DIRECTOR, PHILANTHROPIC PARTNERSHIPS): $202,626 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Dallas Foundation offers highly individualized service to help donors achieve their personal charitable goals, directing more than $1 billion in grants to the community since 1929 and working alongside donors and nonprofits to address the needs shaping Greater Dallas today. Rising GENerosity members Grounded in shared values and a collaborative spirit, Rising GEN members are redefining what it means to give. They prioritize meaningful impact over visibility, seeking transparency, measurable results, and authentic partnership with the organizations they support. Focused on root causes rather than short-term fixes, they invest in the long-term strength of Dallas through work in areas like mental health, education, sustainability, and economic mobility. Here, philanthropy is not a one-time act but a discipline shaped over time, where curiosity leads to deeper understanding and...

What it reported doing in 2024

Overview: the dallas foundation stewards philanthropic resources in partnership with our donor partners and focuses on impact by investing in our community's greatest needs. The dallas foundation has focused on four key program areas: 1. Ensuring a strong and healthy start in life, 2. Economic mobility, 3. Family homelessness, and 4. Child and youth mental health. Through our grantmaking and partnerships, we aim to improve the quality of life for residents across the dallas area.impact metrics: in 2024, we awarded over $5.4 million in discretionary grants to more than 150 nonprofit organizations and, in partnership with our fundholders, a total of approximately $93m. Of these grants, 28% were directed to education-related nonprofit organizations for a total philanthropic investment of over $25m in this cause area. Another $10m in grants focused on nonprofits working in the areas of community and neighborhood development. Success story: as planning for what would eventually become dallas' 2024 bond package began, the dallas housing coalition (dhc) was formed. In 2022, this grassroots, volunteer-powered group of more than 200 organizations committed to advocating for the development and preservation of attainable housing in the city of dallas, began advocating for the city to allocate up to $200 million for attainable housing and homeless solutions in the bond package. Ultimately, three housing-related propositions totaling about $82 million were placed on the may ballot. To cultivate wider community support for housing and eventually propositions g, h, and i, the sections of the bond package that addressed housing and homelessness services, dhc needed resources to develop a communications campaign. The dallas foundation joined dallas area habitat for humanity and charles schwab bank with a combined $100k investment over two years, including 2024, that allowed the group to engage experts to build the campaign and then go public with their message. The efforts equipped residents across the city with social media tools, a website, t-shirts and other opportunities to demonstrate their support. That investment, in turn, yielded $82m of bond funding that will be directed toward mixed-income/mixed-use housing ($36.6m), affordable homeownership development opportunities ($26.4m), and permanent supportive housing and renovations to the bridge homeless recovery center, which is city-owned ($19m). Future goals: looking ahead, the dallas foundation began preliminary steps to developing an updated strategic plan focused on expanding our impact toward ensuring a strong and healthy start for ages 0-5 and identifying donor and community partnerships that ensure we are empowering dallas communities through philanthropic investments and collaboration.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $48.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 98.4%; rating input score 98; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.77; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $532K · 24 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.6M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 45 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 796 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 799 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.