The Cyan Gray Hope Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473046880
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9738683604
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $383
- Expenses
- $1,291
- Assets
- $27,753
- Liabilities
- $8,763
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TRICIA RUSSO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TRICIA RUSSO (PRESIDENT)
- ARLENE GONNELLA (SECRETARY)
- THOMAS GONNELLA (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide creative projects and supportive services that inspire cancer survivors and/or fertility-challenged individuals.the distribution of the ducomentary that we made, as a resource to cancer survivor's journey to start a family using alternative reproductive technologies and a resource for others going down this path. Provide annual grants to help a cancer survivor experiencing infertility build a family and fund cancer research.
What it reported doing in 2023
Distribution of the documentary which is a resource for metastatatic breast cancer & infertility
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -237.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.5; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -36.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -24.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.