The Cultural Cup Food Bank
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 810622721
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022668370
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,815
- Expenses
- $119,324
- Assets
- $1,075
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sabiha Keskin (Chief Executive Officer/Ex Director)
People named in this filing
- Sabiha Keskin (Chief Executive Officer/Ex Director)
- Mini'imah El Amin (Officer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Cultural Cup Food Bank and its staff are committed to providing an environment that protects and maintains a high level of dignity and respect for people in need in which they may receive the best service we can provide. Our focus is on, but not limited to those individuals with medical or religious dietary restrictions. CCFB acknowledges the diversity of those people when faced with dietary or religious food restrictions during times of hardship. The Cultural Cup is also dedicated to providing the best nutritional foods that are available to the homeless population when possible.
What it reported doing in 2023
Emergency Food Programs; 3,050 individuals were given emergency food assistance during the year 2023. Over 1,331 Homeless Lunch bags were given out during the year 2023. Over 321 Dietary Specialty Emergency Food Boxes were also given out during 2023.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.