The Community Relief Fund for Glasgow-barren County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611224002
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Glasgow, KY, USA
- Phone
- 2706519006
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $470,542
- Expenses
- $360,433
- Assets
- $345,803
- Liabilities
- $63,009
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- LARRY GLASS (CHAIRMAN)
- SCOTT BASIL (VICE CHAIR)
- CHARLES M PADGETT (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization provides relief for the poor, distressed, and or underprivileged citizens of glasgow and barren county, Kentucky. The organization is supported primarily through donor contributions, grants, and the united way. The organization provides: assistance for children under 21 who are physically and/or mentally impaired with clothing, school supplies, food, medical, housing and utilities; educational needs for children such as school supplies and clothing; food (vouchers for local stores and on-site food pantry); housing (assistance for rent, rent deposits and mortgage payments); help in purchase of maintenance medications; personal hygiene products (soap, shampoo, deodorant, etc...); shelter (disaster, homeless, domestic violence, and transients); transportation (transients and medical); electricity and water utilities.
What it reported doing in 2022
From 07/01/22 to 06/30/23 we provided 85365 in shelter assistance to 254 households with 546 members. Provided 94838 in utility assistance to 356 households with 819 members. Provided 41096 in food to 419 households with 892 members. Provided 95 in transportation assistance to 3 households with 10 members. Provided 106 in medical assistance for 1 household with 2 members.provided 5000 in back to school assistance for 38 households with 140 members. Provided 3345 in toys for tots for 56 households with 194 members.provided 172 in personal hygeine and cleaning/laundry supplies for 8 households with 33 members.provided 32 misc assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.9%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $71.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.9% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $324K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.