The Community Center Inc of West Fairfield

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
256064155
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
New Florence, PA, USA
Phone
7242441778
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,653
Expenses
$6,091
Assets
$40,223

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MELISSA HEMING (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES HEMING (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN SHEARMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MELISSA HEMING (PRESIDENT)
  • JAMES HEMING (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN SHEARMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote scientific, athletic, literary, educational, health, wellness, and social welfare of its members who life in fairfield township, pa and other surrounding

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide outdoor playgrounds, baseball fields, basketballcourts and walking trails to promote healthy outdooractivities within the community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.5%; rating input score 38
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.6; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 41.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.