The College of Staten Island Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
132933777
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Staten Island, NY, USA
Phone
7189823084
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Services, Organizations of Students

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,435,389
Expenses
$3,889,039
Assets
$6,669,758
Liabilities
$702,680

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHEL HODGE (PRESIDENT)
  • ASHLEY VILLALVA (VICE PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
  • MARIANNE MCLAUGHLIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARGARET ROONEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CHILDCARE)

Highest reported compensation

  • CARLOS SERRANO (TREASURER): $301,492 total reported compensation
  • MICHEL HODGE (PRESIDENT): $282,317 total reported compensation
  • JESSICA COLLURA (DIRECTOR): $247,896 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The college of staten island association, inc. Of the city university of New York is a nonprofit corporation created for the principal purpose of developing and cultivating educational, social, cultural, and recreational activities among students of the college of staten island. It assists students with their study, work, living, curricular, and co-curricular activities, and assists the college in its student related operations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other throughout the year, the campus activities board(cab)successfully developed a calendar of events and activities that fulfilled the organization's mission and provided the csi student body with opportunities to learn and be entertained in a variety of environments with fellow students and members of the college community. Cab sponsored over 50 events. Over 3,401 students participated in these programs. These events included cab supported student activity fee funded community proposals such as the 18th annual gis day, majors and minors week, moon festival, csi student film festival, lunar new year celebration and clinical global issues lectures. Cab membership numbers have increased with the recruitment of first year students. Members have implemented some new initiatives that have been popular including legos and lattes, tacos and tattoos, an earth day event, escape rooms, and a game day and barbecue. The cab annual winterfest was well attended, especially the trackless train that gave students rides from 1c to 1p.in 2024-25, wsia, the college's radio station, recruited and trained student members to be djs. The station hosted an open mic night for halloween and provided music at student life events. During the year, the station helped host spirit week oncampus as well asa halloween event offered by the parks department at the south beach athletic complex. The station hosted multiple give aways for concerts and events. Most importantly, wsia undertook a massive renovation of its 30-year-old studios. Five studio spaces were completely gutted. The walls were repaired and painted and the studios were refurbished with new soundproofing materials including the walls and floor. New furniture was custom built and installed. New equipment was installed in the studios and continues to be brought online. These updated studio spaces will give students real life experience in preparation for mainstream radio jobs, as well as a cleaner and brighter environment to work in.in 2024-25, csi had two student publications that serviced students (the banner and lost in thought). The banner, csi's student newspaper continued to meet and publish throughout the year. Through their involvement in this publication, students produced 17 virtual issues. Lost in thought, csi's newest literary publication, published one online issue and facilitated six literary readings throughout the year.the 2024-25 academic year was a transformative period for student government (sg) and its affiliated commissions, marked by innovation, collaboration, and a deepened commitment to academic and civic engagement. Through a wide array of events and initiatives, sg elevated student involvement, championed academic support, and fostered a more connected and empowered campus community. One of the most impactful academic initiatives of the year was the tutoring night hosted by the academic and curriculum affairs commissions. This event offered students targeted support in a relaxed, engaging setting, and proved to be more than just an event; it was a celebration of peer collaboration and mutual academic growth. The positive feedback from attendees confirmed its success. In the realm of civic engagement, the live-streamed elections panel was a landmark event that increased transparency and accessibility in sg. Students had the opportunity to hear directly from candidates running for president and vice president, ask questions and understand the platforms being presented. The event significantly boosted awareness of student leadership roles and played a key role in encouraging voter participation. The sg elections this year achieved the highest voter turnout in over a decade, a testament to the student body's revitalized sense of agency and belief in the power of representative leadership. This milestone not only reflects enthusiasm for governance but also underscores the importance of inclusive and responsive representation. Another noteworthy achievement was the renovation

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.2%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 58.3%; rating input score 58; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.3%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.5%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.2% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $301K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 58/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.