The Classical Orchard
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882340724
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Manhattan, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7854773679
- Rating
- 92
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Educational Services and Schools - Other
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $111,536
- Expenses
- $92,876
- Assets
- $44,397
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILY WEDDLE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- EMILY WEDDLE (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER ALTWEGG (TREASURER)
- AUBREY DURBIN (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the orchard is to serve as a classically minded christian educational cooperative(co-op). Educational experiences are designed to support homeschool families.
What it reported doing in 2025
The orchard provides classically minded christian educational programming to support homeschool families. The co-op offers structured classes, enrichment activities, and community learning opportunities grounded in a classical education model. Through weekly instruction, parent collaboration, and faith-based curriculum support, the organization equips families with resources that enhance home education and foster academic, spiritual, and social development. These programs strengthen the homeschool community by giving students access to group learning experiences and giving parents tools to guide their childrens education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.7%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $93K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.