The Choir School of Delaware Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205486245
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wilmington, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3025438657
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Singing, Choral
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $655,438
- Expenses
- $684,218
- Assets
- $310,163
- Liabilities
- $233,135
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TABE MASE (PRESIDENT)
- EMERY ABDEL-LATIF (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GRANT FARMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EFF 8/24))
Highest reported compensation
- GRANT FARMER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (EFF 8/24)): $35,206 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The choir school of Delaware (csd) provides a transformational experience for youth ages 7-17 in the greater wilmington area, the majority of whom are considered at-risk. The choir school offers a year-round education program that has a strong legacy of serving and engaging wilmington's youth and families through music and mentoring. Students receive full merit scholarships for their participation in the program. Our students continue to achieve a 100% graduation rate from high school and go on to colleges, universities, trades schools and military service. Our intergenerational model creates an environment where no child is far from an adult who models good behavior, offers encouragement and supports the child's academic needs. Csd continues to reach out to urban youth and provide a safe, productive and creative space; music and mentoring work hand-in-hand so that "harmonizing life and learning" is at the core of the choir school's mission.
What it reported doing in 2024
In fiscal year 2025 (fy25), the choir school of Delaware (csd) successfully executed a masterclass in nonprofit resilience, establishing operational, programmatic, and financial stability as its primary achievements. Faced with a critical "funding cliff" due to the sunsetting of approximately $400,000 in legacy government contracts, csd structurally re-engineered its financial architecture. The organization managed a remarkably strong, balanced financial year by intentionally diversifying its revenue streams into a highly stable, resilient model where government funding, foundation grants, and individual giving each comprised roughly one-third (1/3) of total revenue.by tightening internal budgets and significantly expanding private philanthropy through corporate sponsorships and major donors, csd neutralized the funding lossmissing its total budget targets by only a few thousand dollars. Most importantly, this financial stability allowed csd to retain 100% of its staff, preserving the long-term, trusted mentoring relationships vital to our scholars while delivering uninterrupted, tuition-free programming to wilmington's youth.flagship after-school program: data-driven student successoperating monday through thursday during the academic year, csd's flagship after-school program provides comprehensive resources to at-risk urban youth, including specialized transportation via csd vans, nutritious meals, professional voice and piano lessons, and intergenerational choral rehearsals. In fy25, csd anchored its commitment to academic stability by shifting to a highly disciplined, data-driven intervention model designed to aggressively close systemic proficiency gaps: ixl learning integration: csd integrated the ixl learning digital platform to conduct real-time learning gap assessments. This allowed educators and tutors to deploy surgical, individualized academic interventions in mathematics and language arts. Personalized goals charts: to foster accountability and self-efficacy, students tracked their own daily academic, behavioral, and musical progression via visual goals charts, converting abstract learning benchmarks into explicit, student-owned milestones. The csd store (the merit economy): to incentivize positive habits, academic growth, and performance milestones achieved on ixl and goals charts, csd operated an internal "csd store." students earned merit-based currency to spend at the store, teaching fundamentals of financial literacy, work ethic, and delayed gratification.summer intensive: inspiring innovation & agencycsd's fy25 tuition-free summer programming served as a vital incubator for student agency and creative expression, piloting specialized academic and arts tracks that successfully spurred and laid the groundwork for our current "step up" summer model. Serving students ages 1018, this intensive focused on experiential learning and workforce readiness: applied academics & entrepreneurship: students engaged in a practical entrepreneurship course to build foundational business literacy. Mathematics instruction was reimagined through interactive, high-engagement activitiessuch as utilizing yahtzee to master real-world probability conceptswhile english language arts (ela) development was driven through an innovative digital podcasting curriculum. Student-led creative production: flipping the traditional camp structure, the artistic capstone was an entirely student-created, student-led variety show. Choristers demonstrated leadership and creative ownership by drafting an original theatrical script to seamlessly weave together various musical theatre numbers, managing both the narrative concept and execution.choral innovation, intergenerational repertoire & community reachthe choir school maintained its standard of artistic excellence, serving as a vital intergenerational community hub where student choristers perform alongside professional adult singers and musical mentors. Diverse concert season: csd executed its forma
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: $15.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.75; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $527K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.