The Childrens Center of Lexington Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042484464
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lexington, MA, USA
Phone
7818619370
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,725,449
Expenses
$1,832,103
Assets
$1,146,827
Liabilities
$384,527

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Alaya Killgoar (Vice President)
  • Andrew Goering (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Allegra Taylor (Executive Dir.): $81,267 total reported compensation
  • Sarah Boleski (Executive Dir.): $68,246 total reported compensation
  • Alaya Killgoar (Vice President): $63,826 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Children's Center of Lexington strives to provide a nurturing, child-centered environment; promote the development of a child's emotional, social, physical, creative and intellectual skills; and support and strengthen the family's function as the main source of security and identity for the young child.Since the needs of each child vary, goals are individually set. We seek to balance quiet and active, and group individual activity throughout the day. We provide opportunities for art, block work, dramatic play, cooking, painting, woodworking, puzzles, field trips, science exploration, math and reading readiness, music, creative movement, and sand and water play.

What it reported doing in 2024

Children's Center of Lexington strives to provide a nurturing, child-centered environment; promote the development of a child's emotional, social, physical, creative and intellectual skills; and support and strengthen the family's function as the main source of security and identity for the young child. Since the needs of each child vary, goals are individually set. We seek to balance quiet and active, and group individual activity throughout the day. We provide opportunities for art, block work, dramatic play, cooking, painting, woodworking, puzzles, field trips, science exploration, math and reading readiness, music, creative movement, and sand and water play.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.1%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.1% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Conflict-of-interest policy not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.