The Children's Shelter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741109660
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2102122500
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Foster Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,339,194
Expenses
$8,780,227
Assets
$3,278,887
Liabilities
$1,118,737

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LARHESA MOON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • LARHESA MOON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $262,882 total reported compensation
  • ADRIENNE MARTINEZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $136,654 total reported compensation
  • CRYSTAL CANTU (VP OF PROGRAMS): $110,779 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide a safe trauma focused place for children in crisis, restoring innocence while strengthening families to break the cycle of abuse.

What it reported doing in 2024

Family strengthening and prevention servicesnurse family partnership: the nurse-family partnership is an evidence-based voluntary prevention program providing nurse shelter visitation services to any woman who is low income and pregnant with her first child. Registered nurses provide support, education, and counseling on health, behavioral, and self-sufficiency issues throughout pregnancy, infancy, and continuing until the child reaches the age of two.compadre y compadre: compadre y compadre is a 15-week parenting program that provides men in a fatherhood role the opportunity to learn valuable, life-changing skills as father, provider, teacher, and hero. While most participants are referred to the program from child protective services or the court system, some participate voluntarily seeking the chance to become a stronger and more nurturing parent. Programming is tailored for any male in a caregiving role, taught by an all-male staff. After the 15-week class is completed, all graduates have the opportunity to register for an additional 10-week class to become a compadre mentor.iparent: iparent sa is a comprehensive parenting and family strengthening program with immediate and long-term outcomes that reduce child maltreatment, bolster family relationships, and economic stability. Highly trained and qualified parent educators work with families to facilitate evidence-based parent education curricula to help identify strengths, develop goals, and build self-sufficiency. The program also provides case management, short term respite, group based and long-term assistance for young pregnant mothers and their children.family unit-versity: family unit-versity is an evidence-based parenting pilot program dedicated to helping young parents in bexar and surrounding counties raise happy, healthy children by providing the skills, support, and resources they need to succeed. The program encourages parents to recognize the powerful influence they have as their children's first teachers. The 10-week group course covers topics such as my child's growth & development and the power of words. Alternatively, or in addition to the 10-week course, there are single session boot camps that focus on one topic such as bonding, language building, sensory play and tummy time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 69
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 91.5%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 71.1%; rating input score 71; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 91.5% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $263K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.