Malawi Children's Mission
Legal name: The Children's Mission Dba Malawi Children's Mission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260558044
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Redwood City, CA, US
- Phone
- 9172264955
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Economic Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $502,446
- Expenses
- $424,579
- Assets
- $451,485
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVEN KOFFMAN (CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KAREN HIRSH (U.S. DIRECTOR): $41,665 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide an environment where children can grow, discover their potential, and build a future, empowering them to make a lasting impact in their communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
During the 2024-25 fiscal year, the children's mission focus was supporting the work being done in malawi, africa by mbwana children's mission by spreading awareness, raising funds to support the organization and supporting programming. Here are highlights of the program: 1)since 2007 mbwana children's mission has served approximately 300 orphaned and vulnerable children with an active roster of 160 - children ages 3 - 27 during the 2024-25 fiscal year. At the start, 3 fresh water wells were established providing water access for over 1000 people in the community and to date over 900,000 meals have been served. (continued on schedule o)today, every child receives breakfast and lunch 5 days a week. Medical services are available for the children and their guardians from assessment, treatment, prevention to hospital stays. The onsite primary school, mcm academy has 120 children pre-k - std 8 (of which 93 are mcm children and the others attend daily from a local orphanage malo a mcherezo), 1 child boards full time at aquaid life line primary school, 53 children attend secondary school, 1 child has an apprenticeship, 10 at technical colleges/ trade schools and 2 in university. The program's mission is to provide services for the "whole child and the opportunity to have a future of independence beyond poverty. Mcm is not an orphanage model so the children live in the community with family or guardians. 2)again this year $50k was contributed by one family towards all tertiary programs and the on-site informal vocational training program which launched in january 2022. Young adults from the community were invited to participate including those who were previously a part of mcm.this fiscal year there was full class of 15 for tailoring and 4 for hairdressing who graduated in december 2024. The third cohort started in january 2025 with 15 in tailoring and 14 in hairdressing. 3)a highlight for the year was a partnership started by howard hibbs, us citizen who visited mcm in june 2023, with tiyeni a malawian based organization. In collaboration with mcm, tiyeni taught deep bed farming techniques to 15 farmers (5 from each of the surrounding villages) to help them efficiently harvest more food.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 72
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.5%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.06; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.4% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 12 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $336K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and grants
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.