The Children's Initiative Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205106747
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Portland, ME, USA
Phone
8082827458
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and Fund Distribution

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,799
Expenses
$122,080
Assets
$225,552
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RYAN COLE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STACY ALDINGER (VICE PRESIDE)
  • RYAN COLE (PRESIDENT)
  • JEREMY JM HUBBALL (COFOUNDER/DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support and services to poor, rural villages in asia and africa. The activities are dedicated and focused on improving the current and future standards of living for the children in these areas. Specific focus includes supplementing the inadequate health and education infastructure in these areas.

What it reported doing in 2024

Honduras is the second poorest country in the western hemisphere. Family income averages about 500 a year in the countryside where a majority of hondurans live. The country is wracked by drug wars, corruption, very high unemployment, and a general lawlessness that pervades all aspects of society. It has the highest per capita murder rate of any country in the world. Other than multinational food companies and a growing garment industry, honduras produces little for export. Exacerbating the dire situation are increasingly inconsistent rainy seasons that put subsistence farm families at tremendous risk. Honduras accomplishments: built school, 7-12 grade as many as 126 students in any one year, where there had never been a school scholarships for 13 years of graduations uniforms, shoes, tuition for neediest students reforesting with 5,500 "cash" trees ( mahogany/teak) all sales to benefit school community 6,000 coffee trees ( social/ financial profit) community bunk house: community "office"), guest accommodations for visitors water catchment programs for drinking water as well as for cattle. Work for many if the most dispossessed. Community library fruit orchard for community new truck purchase for "away" students to get to school, as well as community use general village repairs/upkeep: roads, wifi, etc. Numerous "one offs": soccer, music, dance programs. Partnership with catholic women's association allowing indigenous people access to the outside world: access to food, education, and most importantly eradicating fear of the mestizo community writ large.., introduction of cover crops and refurbishing of "worn out" soil, rebuilding of village water tanks as well as distribution systems

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $115K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.