Children's Fund of School Psychology, Inc
Legal name: The Children's Fund of School Psychology
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341533552
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Fayetteville, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6782067540
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,881
- Expenses
- $11,432
- Assets
- $70,845
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEANNE POUND (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- DEBRA ROBERTS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEANNE POUND (PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- DEBRA ROBERTS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LYNNE THIES (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting the physical and emotional well-being of all children and youth; embracing individual and group differences; promoting learning environments which facilitate optimal development; and supporting effective interventions that address both learning and social/emotional functioning to enhance a child's success.
What it reported doing in 2017
Youth empowerment grants - for youth-directed interventionsservice grants - two grants were awarded, each serving more than 30 students in larger-scale school mental health intervention programs
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 61% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -94.4%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.2; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.