TCC Family Health

Legal name: The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
951643332
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Long Beach, CA, USA
Phone
5622779448
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$45,175,704
Expenses
$51,882,323
Assets
$82,237,421
Liabilities
$60,693,841

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mike Van Dyke (President)
  • Rosario Farias (Vice President)
  • Elisa Nicholas (Chief Executive Officer)

Highest reported compensation

  • Elisa Nicholas (Chief Executive Officer): $424,951 total reported compensation
  • Asma M Khan (Director of New Born Services): $348,603 total reported compensation
  • Uduak Iluore (Medical Director): $337,413 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

What it reported doing in 2024

PRIMARY HEALTH, WELLNESS AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE: TCC's multi-disciplinary team of caring MD's, DO's, NP's, LCSW's, LMFT's, PsyD, DDS's, MPH's and health educators tailor and deliver the following services in a manner that meets the specific needs of each patient and family: pediatric, adolescent, adult, and senior comprehensive primary and preventative health care services promoting health, wellness, and healing; gynecological, obstetrics, maternal, and prenatal health care; dental health care; optometry services; chronic disease management services for asthma, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and depression; walk-in immunizations; lab testing; mental/behavioral health services, and medically assisted treatment for substance misuse. TCC provides approximately 175,000 medical, behavioral health, dental, optometric, enabling services and health education visits annually to almost 40,000 patients in the community via telehealth and in-person visits at our 13 sites and mobile medical clinic. TCC also served 1700 individuals experiencing homelessness, distributed over 30,000 lbs. of produce per month totaling 402,000 lbs. per year of fresh food and vegetables and distributed diapers, baby clothing, and other necessities. Additionally, TCC is responding to the housing crisis by offering health and wellness services to the unhoused in our service area through the following collocated sites: (1) TCC at the City of Long Beach Multi-Service Center, (2) TCC at Century Villages at Cabrillo Gateway, and (3) TCC at Mental Health America, (4) TCC's Mobile Medical Clinic, and (5) TCC Family Health and Wellness which included planning, building, and partnering with BRIDGE Housing to bring housing and health services to the Cambodia Town Neighborhood in Long Beach. TCC aims to break down barriers to accessing healthcare by offering comprehensive, community-based services close to our patients' homes through our sites located in low-income neighborhoods. TCC also offers extended hours on-site and through telehealth appointments, care coordination, social and behavioral health services, health education, and enabling services including health coverage linkage, enrollment, and retention. TCC staff conduct consistent in-reach and outreach to assess the current circumstances of patients and their families in order to connect them back to health and wellness services as needed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.8%; rating input score 96
  • Program expense ratio: 83.4%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $31.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 55.6%; rating input score 56; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 95.8% of revenue deployed · 83.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $43.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $425K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1M reported
  • Consistency: 41 of 41 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.