The Children's Cancer Cause Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113485631
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025527392
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,147,706
- Expenses
- $971,296
- Assets
- $1,182,778
- Liabilities
- $70,285
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE WOSAHALA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVE WOSAHALA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $275,486 total reported compensation
- CHARLCIE STEUBLE (DIRECTOR, DONOR ENGAGEMENT): $143,734 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Advocacy education: the organization leads several activities focused on educating patients, survivors, and their families about the impact of federal and state health policy on childhood cancer and survivorship care. Educational programs include monthly newsletters, email alerts on pending legislation and a toolkit providing strategies and tactics on effective advocacy. The organization works to educate legislative and regulatory decision makers on the childhood cancer experience and policy needs. Each month the organization engages in a thoughtful, analytical process reviewing timely and relevant policy issues impacting children with cancer. This information is distributed through a variety of electronic media to patients, survivors and families and informs the policy agenda for the organization and other childhood cancer foundations.we promote policies and programs that aim to accelerate the development of safer, more effective cancer therapies for children and better address the unique needs and lifelong health challenges experienced by childhood cancer survivors and their families.children's cancer awareness and advocacy day: this day brings together pediatric patients, young adult survivors, and families for a day of mobilizing against childhood cancer. The organization partners with other organizations to offer a training workshop for the lobby day which familiarizes survivors with the federal legislative and appropriations process and instructs attendees on effective messaging strategies for visits with congressional members and staff. Public policy advocacy: working closely with leaders in congress, federal agencies, industry, and the broader cancer community, we serve as a dedicated voice of children with cancer, families, and survivors in national debates on health care and cancer policy. Through grassroots advocacy and presentations to government agencies, policy makers, coalitions, and stakeholders, this program provides information on the impact of federal policy on children with cancer and survivors. The purpose is to facilitate the development and approval of more effective and less toxic therapies for children with cancer and ensures appropriate care for survivors through education on the barriers to drug development and the consequences of current treatments. Working closely with leaders in congress, federal agencies, industry, and the broader cancer community, we serve as a dedicated voice of children with cancer, families, and survivors in national debates on health care and cancer policy. The organization also utilizes website education, an advocacy toolkit and monthly newsletters to facilitate its cause. In addition the organization has initiated a 'college scholars' program providing scholarships to survivors of childhood cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.7%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.2 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.7% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $693K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $275K · 23 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.